Notice of Intended Prosecution: picture clearly shows son driving so should I name him?

I received an NOIP as the registered owner and keeper of the vehicle on the 10 March 2007 following an alleged speeding incident on the 6 March 2007. I could not recall whether I was driving the vehicle at the time and date in question and consequently wrote back to the Nottinghamshire Police advising them of such and requesting photographic evidence to assist me in identifying the driver. I subsequently received a reply together with a copy colour photograph of my vehicle clearly showing my son at the wheel at the time of the alleged offence.Details of the incident were included however the speed recorded had been intentionally blanked out. Should I wish to avoid the fine and penalty points I believe I have no option other than to name my son as the driver and advise him to request confirmation of the speed recorded when the NOIP is redirected to him.

It is very rare to get such a good clear picture of the driver. Yes you must name your son or you would be liable for a Section 172 offence for failure to identify the driver. The penalty for a Section 172 is punitive both in terms of points and the level of fine. He will be advised of the speed involved when the ticket is properly directed.

Free legal advice direct to your inbox: Ask Law Answers your road accident or traffic offence legal question.